Traitor!
What Jean Charest Will Hear

Jean Charest
   
Federalism, by its very nature, is a system which embraces compromise. And yet leaders of a more compromising nature have often been turned on by their own people. History is full of too many good examples.
Israeli leader Yitzak Shamir was gunned down by an Israeli hardliner who felt that he was selling out his own people to the Palestinians. David Trimble, the Protestant leader of Northern Ireland, is constantly vilified as a traitor by other Protestants for courageously attempting rework Northern Ireland's institutions so that Catholics can participate. And unfortunately, being labeled a traitor is an inevitable fact of life for federalists within Quebec. It is the separatists' "ace in the sleeve", their magic bullet, and it will soon be directed with renewed fervour at Mr. Charest as he attempts to reconcile Quebec within Canada.

If Jean Charest wins the next election, which appears increasingly likely, he will come under furious pressure to attain for Quebec some greater recognition of Quebec's unique status within Canada. The Canadian government will be provided with a golden opportunity to repair its damaged relationship with Quebec. But Mr. Charest will have to walk a tightrope with the skill of a circus performer. His chances of crossing the tightrope alive depend largely on the response of the RoC. The Meech Lake Accord, which called for recognition of Quebec as a "distinct society" failed mainly because of a hostile response from the RoC, a response which generated great anger in Quebec. Now, Mr. Charest has floated the idea of Quebec being recognized for its "specificity". Predictably, he is being attacked by the separatists for shortchanging Quebec. Far more worrisome, his proposals were derided as another "Meech Lake" by some elements of the English press. One is left wondering whether the RoC has learned anything.

It is important to remember that many in Quebec already consider Mr. Charest untrustworthy. As a young cabinet minister in the Mulroney government, he assisted in watering down the Meech Lake Accord in the failed attempt to salvage the doomed agreement. Lucien Bouchard, Bernard Landry, Jacques Parizeau, Claude Ryan and the other often quoted "godfathers" of Quebec politics will be only too happy to fall upon his body like a pack of wolves, given half the chance. Mr. Charest will need all of his strength to resist their attacks. On top of it all, the ambitious young leader of the ADQ, Mario Dumont, will likely find it irresistible to utter the words "traitor". By doing so, he could inflict terrible wounds on Mr. Charest and re-cast himself as a new Lucien Bouchard, a new "defender" of the people.

Is the situation hopeless? Absolutely not. But neither is a successful new arrangement for Canada and Quebec guaranteed. Separatism is not dead. And it has been proven in the past that separatists are more dangerous when in opposition. At uni.ca, we urge citizens and particularly members of the media in the RoC to adopt a more generous approach to the proposals which Mr. Charest recently outlined. If Mr. Charest wins the next election, real compromise may become possible. At that point, journalistic responsibility may make all the difference between keeping the window of opportunity open (by reporting impartially) and closing it (by indulging in inflammatory journalism). Cynical allusions to "another Meech Lake" are extremely unhelpful and ultimately weaken Mr. Charest. If indeed Mr. Charest's proposals are rejected by the RoC out of hand as another "Meech Lake", many Quebecers will conclude that Canadian federalism is too rigid to embrace Quebec with "honour and enthusiasm". And if this occurs, Mr. Charest will fall from his tightrope with a loud squawk and be quickly picked apart by the separatist birds of prey. At that point, a referendum with "winning conditions" becomes highly likely.




Main Page - Contact us